/ Kentucky Politics |
|
|
|
||
|
Louisville, Kentucky |
Customize | E-mail newsletters | Make this your home page | MySpecialsDirect |
|
Home
Local News
Weather
Sports
Lifestyles
Education Center
Technology
Blogs
Business Watch
Consumer Watch
Contests/Offers
Desktop News
Kentucky Derby
Medical
Message Boards
Mobile News
National/World
Noticias en Español
Politics
Send an E-Card
Special: Iraq
Surveys archive
Traffic Cams
UofL Sports
Videos Online
News Feeds/RSS
|
Smokers would pay more for state health insurance under proposal
05:03 PM EDT on Sunday, October 17, 2004
FRANKFORD, Ky. — Kentucky is one of at least three states looking at
charging higher health insurance premiums for workers who smoke.
The Senate is expected to vote Monday on a proposed health insurance
plan that would require state workers to answer whether they were a
smoker on July 1, 2004. If workers answer yes, they would pay between
$15 and $30 a month more than nonsmokers, depending on the coverage they
choose.
Richard Cauchi, with the National Council of State Legislatures, said he
is not aware of any other state that charges employees who smoke higher
premiums.
But others are moving in that direction. A state insurance commission in
Georgia recently recommended that the state do the same thing, and a
month ago officials in Alabama recommended charging state employees who
smoke a monthly insurance surcharge.
The idea to charge more in Kentucky was originally proposed by Gov.
Ernie Fletcher, a physician.
Fletcher's health plan, though, was roundly criticized by state workers
and teachers as too expensive and offering too few coverage options. The
governor said it was what Kentucky could afford, even with the smoking
fee.
When teachers threatened to strike, Fletcher asked the legislature to
try to improve the plan, and House lawmakers said they believe they have
done so, but at a cost of an additional $182 million.
The House bill kept the basic structure of Fletcher's plan by dividing
the state into eight regions in which employees will be insured by four
carriers and have a choice of three benefit levels.
The bill kept mandatory deductibles for all options, but for two options
reduced them from the levels in Fletcher's plan to the levels in a 2004
insurance option. It also reduced out-of-pocket maximums and reverted to
fixed payments for prescription drugs and doctor's visits instead of
percentage costs.
The smoking fee is expected to generate about $6.7 million in 2005, said
David Wille, an actuary who is working as a consultant to the House.
That figure assumes that smokers make up about 20 percent of the state's
work force, Wille said.
Some smokers are fired up about the proposal; others agree with it.
Ron Greene, 57, a history teacher at Valley High School in Louisville,
said he chooses to smoke, but other than that he has a healthy lifestyle.
"This is discriminatory. Why don't they do the same thing if you're
overweight, or if you eat red meat, or if you drink too much?" Greene
said. "This just opens up a can of worms."
Joe Whitehouse, a 21-year state employee who said he has smoked since he
was a teenager, said he supports the fee.
"It's fair. It really is," said Whitehouse, 57, who works as a welfare
fraud investigator in the Inspector General's office.
Brent McKim, president of the Jefferson County Teachers' Association,
said the Kentucky Education Association supports the overall bill and
does not object to requiring smokers to pay more.
Another way to look at the change is that it would reward employees who
don't smoke with lower premiums, he said.
"I don't think that $15 or $30 a month will cause people who smoke to
stop their coverage," McKim said. "But if they kept adding factors —
like obesity or whether you exercise or not — that could cause some
people to not afford insurance at all."
This text is invisible on the page, but this text is affected by the invisible item's flow. This text is invisible on the page, but this text is affected by the invisible item's flow.
|
Advertising |
|
|
||