What do you think about GQ Rand Paul story?

What do you think about GQ Rand Paul story?

Credit: GQ

What do you think about GQ Rand Paul story?

Print
Email
|

by Joe Arnold

WHAS11.com

Posted on August 10, 2010 at 2:08 AM

Poll:
Did the GQ article change your opinion of Rand Paul?

E-mail me at jarnold@whas11.com or leave a comment.


Ben writes:

A couple of points worth noting I believe:

1. The author (Jason Zengerle) has written extensively and negatively about Rand Paul.  Even calling him a "wacko".  This man is not trustworthy or objective when it comes to Rand Paul.  See: http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/75252/paleo-wacko

2. The story is completely unsubstantiated and is baseless conjecture, contains no tangible proof and only cites one anonymous person.  It's disturbing that a story with such little teeth can make news anywhere, especially in mainstream media (blogs I expect this tripe from.)

3. If Conway is indeed spreading it around, how would he feel if something was said about him from nearly three decades ago that were wild-sounding, had no proof but he (Conway) couldn't disprove it?

This is a dangerous road.  It's sickening too that Conway is doing this.  It reeks of desperation. It's amoral and repugnant and Conway deserves to lose the election based on spreading this alone.

Print
Email
|