Share this article:
Print

Controversy growing over government panel's recommendation for mammograms

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Posted on November 17, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Updated Wednesday, Nov 18 at 5:40 PM

******

(WHAS11) - Breast cancer is the most common cancer, and the second-leading cause of cancer deaths, in American women.
 

But there is controversy growing over a government panel’s recommendation that women wait until their 50s for regular mammograms, and slow down a host of other breast cancer screenings.
 

This controversy is turning traditional prevention advice on its head, and has some worried that there could be deadly consequences.
 

“It’s a pain in the butt.  You sit here hooked up to this thing and they jab a needle in you.  That’s not fun, but that’s not so horrible when you think about how really fortunate I am,” said Kate Merchant.
 

WHAS11 followed 49-year-old Kate Merchant in the final rounds of her weekly chemotherapy visits; treatments she began after her annual mammogram showed a lump.  “Usually the technicians will laugh and talk with you, but after she did that first shot, she was all business,” said Merchant.
 

Cancer-free since September, Kate is thankful for the yearly check-ups she started when she turned 40.  “It saved my life and I think any woman that’s between 40 and 50, this is scary news for them.”
 

But what some are considering the real scary news are new recommendations that women wait until they’re 50 years old for regular mammogram screenings, and do them only once every two years.
 

Doctors at the Brown Cancer Center echo the sentiment that they don’t see how anyone can consider doing away with the research and diagnostic tools.  “It’s has to be a cost-saving measure.  That’s the only thing I can fathom; that insurance companies just don’t want to pay for it anymore,” said one physician.
 

Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, American Cancer Society said, “They could make insurers change their policies in what they’re going to pay for, with respect to mammograms. They could change Medicare and Medicaid.”
 

Kate said she’s living proof of why these new guidelines should be ignored.   “What’s the value of a life?”
 

Members of the task force panel said they’re worried that some women may be over-treated.
 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

grateful42904 said on November 18, 2009 at 6:44 PM

I COULD NOT believe it when I heard the new U.S. guidelines for mammograms! How in the world do you select who is going to benefit or preach early detection when you make these kind of stupid recommendations! ...I don't understand why with years of encouraging women to have mammograms would you negate all that?? ( once again insurance companies and money is behind this) Personally, I was BLESSED with having mammograms ( since age 30 because my mom was 34 when she had breast cancer). My breast cancer was detected as a " suspicious cluster" of possible calcifications, that upon biopsy turned out to be insitu carcinoma..early stages..and I didn't even have to have chemo OR radiation, but mastectomy.I am grateful to Dr Arthur McGloughlin for detecting this..by the time it would have been a lump, might not have been here to tell about it!!! Who is to say my life isn't worth having a mammogram before age 50?? By the way I was 45 yrs old at the time...you choose. small radiation or series?

purecountry said on November 18, 2009 at 7:27 PM

This is EXACTLY why the socialist in the White House needs to keep his nose out of health care. The government is not in place to make medical decisions.