Iowa mom seeks change after gay son rejected as eye donor

Iowa mom seeks change after gay son rejected as eye donor

Iowa mom seeks change after gay son rejected as eye donor

Print
Email
|

by Daniel Finney, The Des Moines Regiser

WHAS11.com

Posted on August 18, 2014 at 11:15 AM

Updated Monday, Aug 18 at 11:20 AM

(USA TODAY) -- Sheryl Moore hoped at least in death the insults to her son would stop.

Her son, A.J. Betts, took his own life in July 2013 in part, she believes, because of an unrelenting barrage of high school bullying about the 16-year-old's sexual orientation and race.

But Moore recently learned of a final slight in the most unexpected of places: the operating room where surgeons harvested his organs for donation.

A.J.'s heart, lungs and kidneys all went to needy recipients for lifesaving surgeries. But other tissues — such as bone, tendons and the corneas of his eyes — were rejected because A.J. was gay and had an unknown sexual history.

Moore had gone the extra step of keeping A.J.'s body functioning for four days after he was brain dead so that his oxygen-deprived organs would have a chance to heal enough to be viable for transplant.

The Iowa Donor Network asked if Moore had any questions about A.J.'s donations. She asked why his eyes weren't donated. They told her U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations prevent the donation of tissues not considered lifesaving from gay men who have had sex with other men or have an unknown sexual history.

"I was floored," Moore said. "It didn't make any sense to me at all. This is an archaic regulation, and it's completely discriminatory. I never planned on becoming a gay rights activist, but I guess I am now."

Rules aim to curb spread of disease

Whole organs — such as the heart, lungs and kidneys — are considered lifesaving donations. Many people on transplant lists die because of the paucity of matching donor organs available.

However, other tissues — such as bone, skin, heart valves and other matter — are classified as life-improving donations and subject to different scrutiny.

The "FDA's regulation of tissues … establishes layers of safeguards that are meant to prevent the spread of communicable diseases, such as HIV and hepatitis, through donated tissue," FDA spokeswoman Jennifer Rodriguez said via email.

FDA rules specifically ban donations from men who have had sex with another man in the last five years due to the risk of HIV and hepatitis B, Rodriguez said.

In A.J.'s case, Moore did not know her son's sexual history to a certainty.

"I mean, he was 16," she said. "I never even saw him hold hands. I never heard him say he had a boyfriend. But I couldn't rule it out completely."

The FDA rules on tissue donation mirror federal regulations on donating blood. Men who have sex with other men are not allowed to donate blood.

However, women who have had sex with a man who has had sex with another man may donate blood one year after their last sexual contact with that partner.

Those who defend the decision to bar tissue donation from men who have sex with men cite statistics such as these: About half of all living HIV patients in the U.S. are gay men, though gay men make up about 4 percent of the nation's population, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

CDC data also show that about 63 percent of new HIV cases occur among men who have sex with men.

Donor restrictions started in 1980s

The FDA regulation dates to the early 1980s, when many hemophiliacs — people whose blood does not naturally clot — contracted HIV and AIDS through blood transfusion.

The most horrifying case involved the Goedken family of Monticello. Five of Mary Goedken's seven sons, two of their wives and an infant grandson all died of AIDS between 1987 and 1997.

The men, all hemophiliacs, contracted the disease through a blood-clotting product contaminated with HIV. The CDC estimated no other family lost more members to AIDS than the Goedkens.

To prevent further outbreaks, the FDA banned the highest-risk population: sexually active gay men.

Part of the problem in the 1980s and early 1990s was that testing for HIV was relatively primitive. It took up to 45 days between infection and detection.

New testing that began in 1999 reduced that window to about seven to 10 days after initial infection. There hasn't been an HIV transmission from a blood transfusion since 1987. And clotting agents, like the ones that killed the Goedkens, are synthetically manufactured now.

Still, the blood and tissue donation restrictions remain in place. The FDA holds firm, saying mistakes could be made.

But the American Association of Blood Banks, America's Blood Centers, the American Red Cross and the American Medical Association have all issued statements urging the FDA to reconsider its ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men.

Some have called for a one-year ban, while others argue that a stronger screening process to investigate the habits of donors is needed, rather than a ban based only on sexual preference.

Mother pushing to ease donor ban

The Iowa Donor Network believes the blood and tissue ban from gays is "an older policy and an archaic policy," said spokesman Tony Hakes.

However, the Donor Network must follow FDA guidelines to continue helping recipients.

Moore, a mother of four and CEO of three firms that monitor indexed annuities for the insurance industry, plans to add her voice to those pushing for more inclusive blood and tissue donation rules for gay men.

For now, she takes comfort in what happened with her son's other organs. One kidney went to a 49-year old woman who had undergone dialysis three times a week since 2010.

Another kidney went to an 11-year-old fifth-grader who loves video games and playing baseball. A.J.'s liver went to a married man with a child.

His lungs went to a 60-year-old man who plays cards, watches TV and spends time with his grandchildren.

And his heart went to a 14-year-old boy who loves sports.

She hopes the recipients will reach out to her. She would like to meet the people who carry parts of her son inside them. But she is heartbroken that A.J.'s eyes weren't donated.

"I would have loved to look into his eyes again," Moore said, "even if they were inside someone else's head."

Print
Email
|